In Torture Case Against Rumsfeld, Lawyers Cite “Widespread Pattern” of Abuse, Need for Accountability (12/8/2006)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union and Human Rights First today
argued before a federal court that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld should
be held accountable for the torture and abuse of detainees in U.S. military
Today’s hearing marked the first time a federal court has considered whether
top U.S. officials can be held legally accountable for the torture scandal in
Iraq and Afghanistan.
“There must be legal accountability in a court of law for high-ranking
government officials who order or allow torture in violation of the most
fundamental legal norms that govern our society,” said ACLU attorney Lucas
Guttentag, who is lead counsel in the case. “Torture is universally prohibited
but Secretary Rumsfeld and the other defendants have not been held responsible
for the orders they gave and the abuse they permitted.”
The ACLU and Human Rights First filed the lawsuit in March 2005 on behalf of
nine innocent civilians who were detained by the United States military in Iraq
and Afghanistan. While in U.S. custody, the men were subjected to abuse, torture
and other cruel and degrading treatment, including severe and repeated beatings,
cutting with knives, sexual humiliation and assault, mock executions, death
threats, and restraint in contorted and excruciating positions. All of the men
were released without charge.
“Our clients’ case is about ensuring that there’s meaningful accountability,
to create an effective deterrent against future violations and to ensure the
courts’ ongoing role in enforcing the law against torture,” said Deborah
Pearlstein, director of Human Rights First’s Law and Security program. “The
Supreme Court has made it clear that wartime does not create a law-free
The ACLU also brought three related lawsuits against Lt. General Ricardo
Sanchez, former Brigadier General Janis Karpinski and Colonel Thomas Pappas. The
four cases were consolidated and transferred to Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan of
the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. All of the defendants have
moved to dismiss the suits in their entirety. The lawsuit is seeking
compensatory damages for the plaintiffs and a court order declaring that the
actions of Secretary Rumsfeld and the other officers violated the U.S.
Constitution, federal statutes and international law.
Today’s hearing addressed the defendants’ claim that they cannot be held
legally liable for the torture of civilians in U.S. custody. The ACLU and Human
Rights First argued that the Constitution and international law clearly prohibit
torture and require commanders to act when they know or should have known of
abuses. In addition to the orders they gave directly, Secretary Rumsfeld and the
other defendants were repeatedly notified of abuse and torture at detention
facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan by military reports, the International Red
Cross and other reports and complaints by human rights organizations.
The groups further charge in the lawsuit that Secretary Rumsfeld personally
approved brutal and illegal interrogation techniques in December 2002. Those
techniques included the use of “stress positions,” the removal of clothing, the
use of dogs, and isolation and sensory deprivation.
Retired military officers and military legal experts have filed a legal brief
in support of the lawsuit. According to the military law experts, “It was the
essence of Secretary Rumsfeld and other defendants’ scope of employment to
educate and train those within their command responsibility to adhere to
domestic and international standards and to do everything within their power to
prevent and punish deviations from them.” The experts urged that allowing the
federal case to proceed would not intrude into matters of military
decision-making, but would reinforce the military’s interest in command
Additional attorneys in the case, Ali et al v. Rumsfeld, are Steven R.
Shapiro, Cecillia Wang, Jennifer Chang, Monica Ramirez, Amrit Singh, Steven Watt
and Omar Jadwat of the ACLU; Michael Posner, Hina Shamsi and Priti Patel of
Human Rights First; Bill Lann Lee of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP;
Paul Hoffman of Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP; Erwin
Chemerinsky of Duke University School of Law; David Rudovsky of Kairys,
Rudovsky, Epstein & Messing LLP; and Art Spitzer of the ACLU of the National
Legal briefs filed in the case, as well as information on the former
detainees, are online at www.aclu.org/rumsfeld and www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/etn/lawsuit/index.asp.
Official government reports have documented many horrific abuses inflicted on
detainees in U.S. custody. The ACLU and other advocacy groups have obtained more
than 100,000 pages of documents concerning abuses through a Freedom of
Information Act lawsuit, online at www.aclu.org/torturefoia. As these
documents indicate, the FBI began to complain about the interrogation techniques
used by the military on detainees in Guantánamo as early as 2002, techniques
that spread to Afghanistan and Iraq. Media reports have also brought many
disturbing incidents to light, including the deaths of detainees in custody.