WEEKLY PLANET
News-Journal editorial: Smoke and Mirrors
The Tampa Tribune latest allegations against Sami Al-Arian rely on unnamed sources
and no documentation.
June 26-July 2, 2002
BY ROCHELLE RENFORD
With tension escalating in the Middle East and U.S Attorney General John Ashcroft
rounding up Muslim men by the thousands here at home, it seems that The Tampa Tribune
couldn't resist taking another jab at Tampa's favorite Palestinian punching bag. Last
Sunday the front-page, above-the-fold headline read: "Israel Ties Al-Arian to Jihad
Board." The headline was like those phony $10,000 checks car dealers send out to suck
in customers: sensational and grossly misleading.
While one might expect to read about concrete evidence against Al-Arian released by
the Israeli government, the article actually delivers unnamed sources and a tepid
admission that Al-Arian may not have broken any laws.
Tribune reporter Michael Fechter wrote that anonymous "former and current senior
Israeli intelligence officials" told him that Al-Arian was part of the Palestinian
Islamic Jihad's "governing council" called Majlis Shura. According to the anonymous
officials, Al-Arian even traveled to Damascus and Tehran for meetings, dropping off a
computer to the PIJ's leader on his way.
These covert sources aren't exactly sure when the council was formed or how many
people are on it, but they do know that it offered "advice" to the terrorist
organization. These sources then go on to state that Al-Arian's role "was in
political ideology and fundraising, not Jihad operations."
In a sidebar, the Tribune explained that they do not usually allow the use of unnamed
sources. However they thought this story was, "of paramount importance to the public"
so they made an exception. Not to worry though, the Tribune carefully weighed their
source's credibility so that readers don't have to weigh it themselves. (And
skeptical readers can't weigh it themselves.)
The Tribune assures readers that all of their sources had their stories straight, and
documentation supported the "general framework" of their allegations. According to
Fechter, however, his sources in Israel refused to show him documentation. "These
were their claims," he said.
He didn't claim to have seen documentation in the article, he said.
But where exactly is the news of "paramount importance" in this front-page news
story? Al-Arian has been under investigation since 1995 for his political ideology
and his fundraising efforts on behalf of the Palestinian cause. Fechter was the
reporter who wrote the series of articles on Al-Arian that started the investigation.
Although the articles stirred up a lot of smoke, they have never yielded any fire.
"I don't know whether to laugh or to condemn. It's ridiculous," Al-Arian said of the
latest Tribune article.
Whether or not it's ridiculous depends on your perspective. Although there was
virtually nothing new in the article -- and certainly not enough to warrant
front-page coverage -- there have been some recent developments in the quest to burn
Al-Arian.
It's not working.
Earlier this month, a lawsuit filed by former federal prosecutor John Loftus,
alleging that Al-Arian was raising funds to send to terrorists, was dismissed by a
Hillsborough Circuit Court judge. The judge gave Loftus 20 days to prove that he was
personally injured by Al-Arian's alleged fundraising, a feat that will require
Superman-like leaps of logic.
USF's stated intention to fire Al-Arian from his post as a professor of computer
engineering after his appearance on FOX's O'Reilly Factor was also dealt a blow this
month. The American Academy of University Professors, a highly respected academic
organization, warned that the university would almost certainly be censured if they
went through with the termination.
The group literally wrote the book on academic freedom and said that USF President
Judy Genshaft would be guilty of violating that principle if Al-Arian is not returned
to the classroom. If the university is censured, recruiting and retaining the
top-notch talent needed to help the school evolve into the research giant of
Genshaft's dreams will be tough. Even with the building of on-campus Greek housing.
Although the university's Spokesman Michael Reich and the chairman of its Board of
Directors Dick Beard have asserted that the AAUP's opinion doesn't count, Genshaft
has kept her mouth shut and Al-Arian is still cashing his pay checks.
So, what would prompt Israeli officials to divulge information so crucial to security
that neither the sources' names nor their documentation could be disclosed? And
what's with the U.S. government anyway? With this much proof, Al-Arian should be in
prison.
When it comes to Middle Eastern politics everybody has an agenda. Palestinians, by
and large, want a separate state. The European Union, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and
the United Nations want them to have one too. Secretary of State Colin Powell is
talking about an interim Palestinian state and even President Bush has stated that
statehood is a goal. Demonizing Palestinians does not hurt people who don't want to
see that happen.
Of course, it's impossible to know where Fechter's sources stand because they aren't
named and Fechter doesn't address the issue.
He does allude to the reason U.S. officials haven't arrested Al-Arian: that messy
caveat due process. At the time of this article, the United States hasn't been
renamed Ashcroft Land. U.S. courts still actually require tangible proof of a crime
for a conviction. Undocumented evidence from unknown sources isn't enough.
When information about Al-Arian's activities was put before a judge in 1997, he found
no evidence that a crime had been committed.
Of course there is documented evidence of Al-Arian's guilt, according to Fechter's
sources. It's in Israel and the U.S. government is just too lazy to pick it up.
Perhaps these shadowy sources are too afraid of having their names show up on a
Fed-Ex receipt to mail it.
Nevertheless, the U.S. intelligence community may be too ignorant to understand it
anyway, they said. That's a pretty safe criticism to make in the wake of recently
publicized FBI and CIA screw-ups prior to Sept. 11.
Lest all the news revolve around Al-Arian, a tidbit about his brother-in-law Mazen Al
Najjar appeared in the article too. According to Fechter's sources, as "recently" as
1994, terrorist suspects arrested in Israel were found to have Al-Najjar's phone
number in their possession. They were going to call him at home to let him know how
the terror was going.
"It isn't clear whether this allegation is part of a package of secret evidence that
was used by immigration officials to jail Al-Najjar as a national security threat in
1997," Fechter wrote.
It's more likely that his articles were what were in that secret evidence file.
According to Al-Najjar's attorney David Cole who has freed more than 10 men held on
secret evidence, newspaper clippings are a hush file staple.
Immigration Judge R. Kevin McHugh reviewed the secret evidence used to jail Al-Najjar
in 1997 and used it to set him free in 2000, stating that the government had failed
to prove its case. Al-Najjar was arrested again last November when the INS issued a
final deportation order, but since he's a stateless Palestinian, there's no place to
deport him to. He remains in solitary confinement at Coleman Federal Penitentiary
while his lawyers argue that the government has exceeded the six months they had to
deport him, charge him with something or let him go.
"What they're writing about him couldn't be further from the truth," said Al-Arian.
Although Fechter flew all the way to Israel to speak with his secret sources for the
story, he didn't drive to North Tampa to take a look at Al-Arian's passport to see if
his secret sources were correct about Al-Arian's travel to Tehran or Damascus for
Jihad get-togethers, said Al-Arian's attorney Robert McKee. He didn't even ask to see
it, he said.
Of course Al-Arian could have offered up the passport when he read the list of
questions Fechter sent for his response but he chose not to. For every piece of proof
he gives up, said Al-Arian in an interview with the Planet, journalists will always
want more.
Fechter concluded his article with quotes from Reuven Paz, director of the Project
for the Research of Radical Islam in Haifa and they were the most telling comments in
the article.
"Whatever has happened in Tampa was more about ideology and politics than directing
operations," Paz told Fechter.
The same could be said of the Tribune's coverage.
Contact Staff Writer Rochelle Renford at 813-248-8888, ext. 163, or
rochelle.renford@weeklyplanet.com.
|